Yes, a woman is as capable as a man of pulling a trigger. But the goal of our nation's military is to fight and win wars. Before taking the drastic step of allowing women to serve in combat units, has the government considered whether introducing women into the above-described situation would have made my unit more or less combat effective?OK, Mr. Smith: POO is your concern? The fact that those who serve our country are willing to do so, knowing that many of them (1) won't come back alive or (2) will come back with severe injuries, is what makes me so proud of our troops. My guess is that the more serious risks are what our people think about before they go into battle. Not about poo. My hubby has not even once listed "poo" among the serious risks that he and his colleagues faced.
Societal norms are a reality, and their maintenance is important to most members of a society. It is humiliating enough to relieve yourself in front of your male comrades; one can only imagine the humiliation of being forced to relieve yourself in front of the opposite sex.
Women really are as capable as men when it comes to being willing to defend our country, and it irks me no end when folks ignore one of the benefits of letting women serve alongside men. Those combat experiences that make people eligible for promotion and more responsibility need to be open to everyone willing to serve.
So, Mr. Smith: maybe it's time to rethink your priorities.